Trouble for Bannon as Prosecutors Make Clear They Can Make Their Case Against Him in a Single Day

District attorneys managing the case versus White Home chief strategist Steve Bannon on charges of contempt of Congress explained they can make their case versus him in a single day, according to a court filing.

“The Government anticipates that its case-in-chief will consist of one day of testimony,” district attorneys stated in the report, including that they wish to restrict Bannon from utilizing any defense that declares that he was acting upon the recommendations of his legal representatives when he defied the subpoena from your house Select Committee charged with examining the occasions of January 6.

The Justice Department and Bannon’s defense disagree on a timeline for the trial. While the Justice Department has actually proposed starting Bannon’s trial on April 15, 2022, Bannon’s legal representatives have actually proposed an October 17, 2022 date, arguing that they require more time to gather proof.

“This case raises complex constitutional issues of first impression,” the filing checks out. “Some of these issues involve inter-branch relationships and on the operations of the U.S. government at its highest levels. There is no basis for having these issues adjudicated on a rushed basis.”

District attorneys slammed Bannon recently, stating that he is attempting to make his case a trial by media “rather than in court.”

The prosecution’s remarks followed Bannon’s defense asked for that the D.C. U.S. Lawyer’s workplace unseal all proof in the event, consisting of grand jury statement.

“The defense’s misleading claims, failure to confer, unexplained wholesale opposition, and extrajudicial statements make clear the defense’s real purpose: to abuse criminal discovery to try this case in the media rather than in court,” the district attorneys composed in a court filing, arguing that unsealing the proof would weaken the personal privacy of any witnesses who might have affirmed to the grand jury and weaken their statement throughout trial.

“The defendant’s threat of ‘going on offense’ and making this case ‘hell’ cannot be ignored when considering these witnesses’ privacy interests in their personal background information,” the filing checks out.

Jobber Wiki author Frank Long contributed to this report.