Austin DUI attorneys are specialized lawyers who deal with people charged with driving under the influence (DUI). They are well-versed in the laws that govern such a violation and can assist you with the process. In this article, we will look at some of the factors that are taken into account when determining whether an individual is guilty or not.
The first factor that the court takes into consideration when deciding on a person’s guilt in an Austin DUI case is the level of intoxication in which the individual was found. While some cases require a blood alcohol content (BAC) of 0.08%, there are other cases that require an even lower level of intoxication. It is important to remember that a BAC of zero would mean an individual would have no impairment whatsoever, while a lower BAC would indicate an impairment of a lesser degree.
Other factors that the court considers when determining the guilt of an Austin DUI are the amount of time that was spent in the driver’s vehicle, as well as the number of times the individual has been driving under the influence. Generally, if the individual was found to be driving under the influence more than three times, they may be charged with a Class A or B misdemeanor.
The second factor that the court considers when deciding on someone’s guilt in an Austin DUI case is the severity of the offense. A conviction of a class A or B misdemeanor could result in up to a year in jail, and a significant fine, as well as having your driver’s license suspended for at least one year. While some of the penalties associated with this offense are severe, others are much less so. An individual who is charged with this offense may be eligible for probation, but they must still meet some other criteria to qualify.
The third factor that the court considers when determining the guilt of an Austin DUI case is the amount of damage that the person did to another individual. As mentioned previously, a BAC of zero would mean that an individual would not have any impairment at all. If, however, the individual was found to be intoxicated, they will likely be charged with an offense similar to aggravated assault. In order to prove that they are guilty of this offense, the prosecution will need to show that the individual was a danger to themselves and/or others and caused serious injury or death to another individual.
Defense lawyers may also consider using blood tests to disprove the case against their client. If the test reveals the presence of alcohol at the legal limit, then the defense attorney may argue that they should not be found guilty of a DUI at all.
There are also a number of reasons that a defense lawyer may decide not to go to trial with a case, which means that they decide not to proceed with the case as a defense attorney. This does not mean that they do not represent the individual; in any way, but it does mean that they may decide to take it elsewhere.
A defense lawyer can help an individual to decide where to go for legal representation. Many of them prefer to work with private firms that are based out of their area to handle such matters. If the client lives in a rural area, they may also find that they can get a much better deal. Also, the lawyer may find that they can negotiate with the prosecutors in order to reduce the severity of the charges or the maximum fines that may be involved.