Activision sues indie dev over Warzone name in Call of Duty dispute

On April 8, Activision submitted a protest versus the indie designer behind the browser-based technique video game Warzone. The grievance is over the use and hallmark rights for the “Warzone” title, which the 2 business have actually remained in disagreement about for the last numerous months.

The main disagreement is over whether Activision deserves to utilize “Warzone” as part of the title for its Call of Task fight royale, and whether it can hallmark the name. The Warzone technique video game was established by Randy Ficker, who is not called in the grievance and is rather recognized as

Ficker initially released his technique video game in 2017, nevertheless he didn’t submit a hallmark for the name up until October 2020. On the other hand, Call of Task: Warzone was launched in March 2020, with a hallmark very first submitted in June 2020.

According to Activision, on Nov. 20, 2020,’s counsel sent a cease and desist letter “demanding that Activision ‘change the name of its games, stop using Warzone’s WARZONE mark, and abandon the trademark applications.’” Activision also claims that has threatened legal action against the company over the name, including seeking “massive damages.”

This creates what Activision calls an “actual and live controversy as to the parties’ respective rights to use or register trademarks that include the word ‘Warzone.’” Activision also points out that both its own use of Warzone, and the use by, are far from the only games with similar titles.’s initial assertion for blocking Activision’s trademark was that the name caused significant confusion between Activision’s Call of Task game and the Warzone strategy game. However, Activision declares in its complaint that the games are so different that confusion seems unlikely, or even impossible.

“Activision’s Call of Duty: Warzone could not be more different from Defendant’s game, a low-budget, niche virtual board game like Hasbro’s Risk where players take turns moving numbers (representing “armies”) across a map of the world. Indeed, it is inconceivable that any member of the public could confuse the two products or believe that they are affiliated with or related to each other,” Activision says in its complaint.

However, on a GoFundMe page set up to fund’s legal battle with Activision, Randy Ficker, the developer of browser game, claims that the confusion has actually already happened.

“People tell me all about how their [Xbox] can’t connect, or how their PS4 got hacked, how they wish they could carry teammates, etc. My game isn’t even on [Xbox] or [PS4]. I send the same reply to each of them: ‘Warzone and Call of Duty: Warzone are different games. You should contact Activision,’” said Ficker in his post.

In its complaint, Activision says that it attempted to negotiate a settlement. However, after both sides rejected offers, Activision says stopped negotiating.

Now Activision is seeking an official judgment in the case, which it seems will be met with Ficker’s own legal defense — according to his GoFundMe page.

Polygon has reached out to Activision for comment.

Update: In a statement to Polygon, an Activision Blizzard spokesperson said:

The defendant named in this suit has baselessly threatened the business. We do not infringe his intellectual property. We are filing this action so the court can reject his frivolous and irresponsible declares.

Jobber Wiki author Frank Long contributed to this report.